Q&A Webcast Episode: 16 January 2011
In this 16 January 2011 episode of Q&A Webcast, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered six questions on judgments of actions and ideas, judging people efficiently, online jerks, seeking popularity, tattoos and piercings, dating a pot-smoker, and more in an hour-long broadcast. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers was the audio co-host.
Remember, while Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free to produce: they require our time, effort, and money – week in and week out. So if you enjoy them, please contribute to our tip jar. We suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. You can contribute by PayPal to diana@philosophyinaction.com. If you prefer to send a check, please write "P/A" in the memo field and send it to "Diana Hsieh; P.O. Box 851; Sedalia, CO 80135."
Listen Now 
- Duration: 1:01:58
Download the Episode 
Subscribe to the Feed
Share This Episode
Segments: 16 January 2011
Question 1: Judgments of Actions and Ideas (4:03)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on judgments of actions and ideas.
How does one properly judge a person's actions and ideas? I've read that one can judge a person's ideas as good or evil based on whether they are true or false, respectively. I've also read/heard that it's usually better to judge a person's actions since people often aren't very exact in their ideas and in what they say. Should you judge a persons ideas or actions? Or both? And, what is the proper way to judge a person's ideas and actions?
My Answer, In Brief: You should judge a person for his whole person – meaning his thinking, ideas, and actions. But take care to focus on his serious commitments.
Tags: Ethics, Evil, Judgment, Justice, Sanction
Listen or Download 
Comments
Question 2: Judging People Efficiently (19:27)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on judging people efficiently.
How can I judge people more efficiently? It would be helpful to be more efficient in judging whether certain individuals are appropriate for a friendship. Sometimes it takes me a long time to decide whether I would like to be friends with someone or not. It takes me even longer to decide whether I would like to be in a romantic relationship with someone. How can I speed this process up? What are some key factors that might help me make these types of decisions more efficiently?
My Answer, In Brief: Relationships are not all or nothing. Allow the intimacy of the relationship to develop naturally, notice and judge what emerges, and then move closer or back off accordingly.
Tags: Ethics, Judgment, Justice, Relationships
Listen or Download
Comments
Question 3: Online Jerks (29:36)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on online jerks.
Why are some people such jerks on the internet? Some seemingly decent people become downright malicious bastards on the internet, particularly when posting anonymously. Why is that? What does such behavior say about a person's moral character? How can a person keep his manners, his benevolence, and his cool in full force when online?
My Answer, In Brief: The possibility of anonymity and psychological distance of online communication often makes being a jerk easy, so watch for those tendencies in yourself.
Tags: Communication, Ethics, Internet, Judgment, Justice
Listen or Download
Comments
Question 4: Seeking Popularity (41:03)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on seeking popularity.
Is it always wrong to seek popularity? Because of the character Peater Keating I can't figure out in what context it would be right for an Objectivist to value or desire popularity, if at all.
My Answer, In Brief: The moral problem with Peter Keating was his second-handed mode of thinking and acting, not his seeking of popularity per se. Popularity can be a rational value, in some contexts.
Tags: Ethics, Fame, Independence
Listen or Download
Relevant Links
Comments
Question 5: Tattoos and Piercings (45:20)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on tattoos and piercings.
Are tattoos or piercings – all of them, or just some kinds – irrational and/or self-destructive? If so, why?
My Answer, In Brief: The rationality of body art depends largely on what a person does and why. Given its permanence, a person should be careful that it reflects his values and enhances the beauty of his body.
Tags: Body Modification, Ethics
Listen or Download
Comments
Question 6: Dating a Pot-Smoker (51:32)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on dating a pot-smoker.
Is it proper to date a girl who smokes pot? This woman, while not being an Objectivist, has many great qualities like being smart, attractive, funny, pro-reason and pro-man in general. She, however, likes to smoke marijuana. She says that it provides a great pleasure and relaxes her body and mind after a long day of work. What should I do about it? Confront her? Immediately break up with her?
My Answer, In Brief: Regular marijuana use is a red flag for a person with problems in life, but try having a conversation – or two or three – to understand her views and your own. Also, a 30-day pot-free challenge might be very telling for everyone.
Tags: Alcohol/Drugs, Egoism, Ethics, Judgment, Justice, Moral Wrongs, Relationships, Romance
Listen or Download
Comments
Conclusion (59:46)
Thank you for joining us for this episode! If you enjoyed this episode, please don't forget to contribute to contribute to our tip jar. Also, please don't forget to submit and vote on questions for upcoming broadcasts in in the question queue.
About Philosophy in Action Q&A Webcast
Every Sunday morning, philosopher Dr. Diana Hsieh answers four meaty questions applying rational principles to the challenges of real life in her live hour-long internet radio show, Philosophy in Action Advice Radio. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers co-hosts the show. The audience can ask follow-up questions and make comments in the text-based chat.
You can listen to Philosophy in Action broadcasts as podcasts by subscribing to the Philosophy in Action's Podcast RSS Feeds. Be sure to sign up for the Newsletter and connect on social media.
You can also peruse the show archives, listening to whole episodes or just selected segments. The show archives are sorted by date and by topic.
For regular updates, commentary, and humor from Dr. Diana Hsieh, visit her blog NoodleFood, and subscribe to its rss feed.
Dr. Diana Hsieh is a philosopher specializing in practical ethics. She received her Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 2009. Her dissertation argued that Thomas Nagel's "problem of moral luck" can be resolved by an Aristotelian theory of moral responsibility. She began podcasting in 2009, then webcasting in 2010.
Support Philosophy in Action
Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free for us to produce: they require our time, effort, and money. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to our tip jar!
If you'd like to make a one-time contribution in an amount not listed, use this link. For instructions on canceling or revising your monthly contribution, visit the support page.
Thank you, if you've contributed to our tip jar! You make our work possible, and we're so grateful for that! Also, whether you're able to contribute financially or not, we always appreciate your helping us spread the word about Philosophy in Action to anyone you think might be interested, as well as submitting and voting on questions for upcoming episodes.