Q&A Webcast Episode: 27 March 2011
In this 27 March 2011 episode of Q&A Webcast, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered six questions on immoral means to great values, optional values versus moral values, adoption versus abortion, the excuse of "i'm only human", objectivist conferences, laws and regulations, and more in an hour-long broadcast. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers was the audio co-host.
Remember, while Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free to produce: they require our time, effort, and money – week in and week out. So if you enjoy them, please contribute to our tip jar. We suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. You can contribute by PayPal to diana@philosophyinaction.com. If you prefer to send a check, please write "P/A" in the memo field and send it to "Diana Hsieh; P.O. Box 851; Sedalia, CO 80135."
Listen Now 
- Duration: 58:18
Download the Episode 
Subscribe to the Feed
Share This Episode
Segments: 27 March 2011
Question 1: Immoral Means to Great Values (6:11)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on immoral means to great values.
Is it ever acceptable to act immorally if one is willing to accept the consequences? This question was sparked by a statement in the 9 January 2011 webcast that it would be wrong to deceive a partner in order to save a relationship. Are there ever cases where one cares so much about a particular value that it can be legitimate to act immorally (and thus, in all probability, hurt one's own life) in order to gain or keep that value? For example, what if life were not worth living without that value?
My Answer, In Brief: To act viciously in pursuit of a value destroys the actual worth of that value – and degrades your own moral character.
Tags: Ethics, Relationships, Romance, Values
Listen or Download 
Comments
Question 2: Optional Values Versus Moral Values (15:31)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on optional values versus moral values.
Are "optional values" genuine values? Sometimes Objectivists distinguish between "moral values" and "optional values." What does that mean? Is the distinction legitimate? How does it apply to real life?
My Answer, In Brief: Optional values genuinely promote a person's life and happiness, but they are not universally necessary, but rather depend on a person's particular circumstances.
Tags: Ethics, Optional Values
Listen or Download
Comments
Question 3: Adoption Versus Abortion (22:35)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on adoption versus abortion.
Why do you think that giving a child up for adoption can be "problematic"? Why wouldn't adoption be preferable to abortion in most cases? (This question is a follow-up to the discussion in the 23 January 2011 webcast about children as an optional value.)
My Answer, In Brief: Adoption is a wonderful option in many cases, but the differences between an embryo or early-stage fetus and born baby often make adoption far more emotionally and morally difficult.
Tags: Abortion, Adoption, Children, Ethics, Parenting
Listen or Download
Comments
Question 4: The Excuse of "I'm Only Human" (31:16)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on the excuse of "i'm only human".
What do you think of the oft-quoted bromide "I'm only human"? I have heard that phrase often, and it seems there are several uses to which it is applied, some legitimate and some seem nefarious and ugly.
My Answer, In Brief: The phrase has two distinct meanings – "don't expect me to be good" and "hey, pay attention to my limits." The former is a false excuse (and often vile), while the latter is a useful reminder. Due to these mixed meanings, the phrase is perhaps best avoided.
Tags: Ethics, Language, Responsibility
Listen or Download
Comments
Question 5: Objectivist Conferences (37:45)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on objectivist conferences.
What are the benefits of attending Objectivist conferences in person? I know that there are several regional Objectivist conferences this year in addition to the Ayn Rand Institute's OCON. What are the benefits of attending these in person, rather than just listening to the lectures via a webcast or buying the lectures afterwards?
My Answer, In Brief: Objectivist conferences offer huge benefits in the form of social interaction and networking, even apart from the lectures!
Tags: Friendship, Objectivist Movement, Relationships
Listen or Download
Relevant Links
Comments
Question 6: Laws and Regulations (46:07)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on laws and regulations.
Are regulations necessarily different from laws? Regulations do not violate the presumption of innocence – they are jurisprudential signals. A law against murder does not violate the presumption of innocence; rather, it is a signal that denotes a consequence that will be levied upon the violator of the law. This is the same standard that regulations follow. A law is a "regulation" on behavior in the way that legislative regulations are, in fact, "regulations" on business behavior. Is this a correct assessment of laws and regulations?
My Answer, In Brief: Legislation differs from regulations on two axes: the source of the laws and their objectivity.
Listen or Download
Relevant Links
Comments
Conclusion (57:13)
Thank you for joining us for this episode! If you enjoyed this episode, please don't forget to contribute to contribute to our tip jar. Also, please don't forget to submit and vote on questions for upcoming broadcasts in in the question queue.
About Philosophy in Action Q&A Webcast
Every Sunday morning, philosopher Dr. Diana Hsieh answers four meaty questions applying rational principles to the challenges of real life in her live hour-long internet radio show, Philosophy in Action Advice Radio. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers co-hosts the show. The audience can ask follow-up questions and make comments in the text-based chat.
You can listen to Philosophy in Action broadcasts as podcasts by subscribing to the Philosophy in Action's Podcast RSS Feeds. Be sure to sign up for the Newsletter and connect on social media.
You can also peruse the show archives, listening to whole episodes or just selected segments. The show archives are sorted by date and by topic.
For regular updates, commentary, and humor from Dr. Diana Hsieh, visit her blog NoodleFood, and subscribe to its rss feed.
Dr. Diana Hsieh is a philosopher specializing in practical ethics. She received her Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 2009. Her dissertation argued that Thomas Nagel's "problem of moral luck" can be resolved by an Aristotelian theory of moral responsibility. She began podcasting in 2009, then webcasting in 2010.
Support Philosophy in Action
Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free for us to produce: they require our time, effort, and money. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to our tip jar!
If you'd like to make a one-time contribution in an amount not listed, use this link. For instructions on canceling or revising your monthly contribution, visit the support page.
Thank you, if you've contributed to our tip jar! You make our work possible, and we're so grateful for that! Also, whether you're able to contribute financially or not, we always appreciate your helping us spread the word about Philosophy in Action to anyone you think might be interested, as well as submitting and voting on questions for upcoming episodes.