Q&A Webcast Episode: 8 May 2011
In this 8 May 2011 episode of Q&A Webcast, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered six questions on reasoning from the prisoner's dilemma, hiring people with an internet presence, the morality and limits of revenge, building codes, numbers of men versus women in objectivism, wealth creation, and more in an hour-long broadcast. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers was the audio co-host.
Remember, while Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free to produce: they require our time, effort, and money – week in and week out. So if you enjoy them, please contribute to our tip jar. We suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. You can contribute by PayPal to diana@philosophyinaction.com. If you prefer to send a check, please write "P/A" in the memo field and send it to "Diana Hsieh; P.O. Box 851; Sedalia, CO 80135."
My News of the Week: Here's what's on my plate of late. Last week, I testified in defense of free speech at hearing on Colorado's campaign finance laws. I'm still working on my updates to Explore Atlas Shrugged. This week, I'm going to be working on my two lectures on pride for ATLOSCon. And here's the video of my short talk on Cookie Cutter Medicine.
Listen Now 
- Duration: 59:22
Download the Episode 
Subscribe to the Feed
Share This Episode
Segments: 8 May 2011
Question 1: Reasoning from the Prisoner's Dilemma (5:07)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on reasoning from the prisoner's dilemma.
What do you think of the "Prisoner's Dilemma"? Something about the Prisoner's Dilemma as a basis for economic and ethical claims never settled with me, but I'm not sure why. What is your opinion of it from a philosophical point of view?
My Answer, In Brief: The Prisoner's Dilemma cannot be used as a basis for ethical or economic reasoning, because it's a narrow case that only confirms some more fundamental principles of justice and cooperation.
Listen or Download 
Relevant Links
Comments
Question 2: Hiring People with an Internet Presence (14:35)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on hiring people with an internet presence.
What do you think about the dangers of hiring someone with an internet presence? Some people in business have concerns about hiring people active on blogs, social media, and other online forums. Often that's because of controversial positions advocated by the potential employee that they don't want to reflect on the company or cause drama internally. Also, they might have concerns that the person would share information about the company (including co-workers) that ought to be be kept private. So what are the principles involved in hiring someone who posts controversial material online? For example, should their potential position in the company matter, such as whether they'll be working in the back office or with the public? Or, should companies simply ignore what people say and do on their off-time, including on the internet?
My Answer, In Brief: A person's internet activities can reveal facts relevant to suitability for a job, such as character, personality, interests, and judgment. To that extent, as well as for other matters relevant to the work, a person's online activities are of interest to a current or potential employer.
Tags: Business, Ethics, Internet
Listen or Download
Watch Now
Comments
Question 3: The Morality and Limits of Revenge (29:49)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on the morality and limits of revenge.
Is revenge ever moral? In a famous song, singer Carrie Underwood describes trashing her boyfriend's truck after she finds out that he cheated on her. Is it ever moral to seek out revenge like this on someone who has lied to you or has done something for which there are no real legal repercussions? What are the limits of moral revenge, if any?
My Answer, In Brief: It's never moral to violate a person's rights, including property rights. In addition, it's self-destructive to focus on getting one's revenge. Instead, exercise your right to free association – and cut the person out of your life so that you can pursue goals and projects that matter to you.
Tags: Ethics, Justice, Revenge, Rights
Listen or Download
Relevant Links
Comments
Question 4: Building Codes (38:30)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on building codes.
Are building codes ethical? In light of the building earthquake and tsunami in Japan, a lot of people are crediting the strict building codes and urban planning for reducing the damage. Is it proper to support building codes, which limit property rights, if the goal is to prevent damage and destruction in the event of an inevitable natural disaster, such as an earthquake?
My Answer, In Brief: Again, it's never moral to violate a person's rights, including property rights. Building codes are neither effective nor necessary means to protect people and property in natural disasters.
Tags: Business, Capitalism, Law, Regulation, Rights
Listen or Download
Comments
Question 5: Numbers of Men Versus Women in Objectivism (49:08)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on numbers of men versus women in objectivism.
Why are more men than women attracted to Objectivism? More men than women seem to be attracted to Ayn Rand's philosophy of Objectivism. Why is that? And does it matter?
My Answer, In Brief: Presumably, more men are attracted to Objectivism than women for the same reason that more men are attracted to philosophy than women. Those reasons may be due to innate differences or cultural influences, yet ultimately, they reflect people's choices. However, the gender gap is not nearly as wide today as it used to be.
Tags: Community, Gender, Objectivist Movement
Listen or Download
Comments
Question 6: Wealth Creation (52:40)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on wealth creation.
Why is wealth not a zero-sum game? If someone makes a profit, doesn't that mean that someone else loses?
My Answer, In Brief: Values are not mere material things: they can be created and destroyed – and they are increased by voluntary trade. As such, profits are the creation of value, not merely the extraction of values from other people.
Tags: Business, Economics, Egoism, Ethics, Wealth
Listen or Download
Relevant Links
Comments
Conclusion (58:24)
Thank you for joining us for this episode! If you enjoyed this episode, please don't forget to contribute to contribute to our tip jar. Also, please don't forget to submit and vote on questions for upcoming broadcasts in in the question queue.
About Philosophy in Action Q&A Webcast
Every Sunday morning, philosopher Dr. Diana Hsieh answers four meaty questions applying rational principles to the challenges of real life in her live hour-long internet radio show, Philosophy in Action Advice Radio. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers co-hosts the show. The audience can ask follow-up questions and make comments in the text-based chat.
You can listen to Philosophy in Action broadcasts as podcasts by subscribing to the Philosophy in Action's Podcast RSS Feeds. Be sure to sign up for the Newsletter and connect on social media.
You can also peruse the show archives, listening to whole episodes or just selected segments. The show archives are sorted by date and by topic.
For regular updates, commentary, and humor from Dr. Diana Hsieh, visit her blog NoodleFood, and subscribe to its rss feed.
Dr. Diana Hsieh is a philosopher specializing in practical ethics. She received her Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 2009. Her dissertation argued that Thomas Nagel's "problem of moral luck" can be resolved by an Aristotelian theory of moral responsibility. She began podcasting in 2009, then webcasting in 2010.
Support Philosophy in Action
Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free for us to produce: they require our time, effort, and money. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to our tip jar!
If you'd like to make a one-time contribution in an amount not listed, use this link. For instructions on canceling or revising your monthly contribution, visit the support page.
Thank you, if you've contributed to our tip jar! You make our work possible, and we're so grateful for that! Also, whether you're able to contribute financially or not, we always appreciate your helping us spread the word about Philosophy in Action to anyone you think might be interested, as well as submitting and voting on questions for upcoming episodes.