Show Archives

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on proper reliance on experts.

What role should experts play in our decision-making? Specifically, should a person defer to experts in fields where he's not well-informed? What if he's only partially knowledgeable? Should experts expect such deference? Does it matter whether the field is philosophy, plumbing, diet, or something else?

My Answer, In Brief: We can and ought to make use of experts when our own knowledge is lacking. However, we shouldn't ever defer to them but rather keep an active mind, acting as traders in knowledge.

Tags: Epistemology, Expertise, Independence

Listen or Download

Comments

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on the evil of immanuel kant.

Was Immanuel Kant evil rather than just wrong – and if so, why and how? I understand that Kant's ideas are very wrong, even evil. But couldn't he have been honestly mistaken, perhaps not taking his own work seriously? Given that he never advocated or did anything even remotely comparable to Hitler's genocide, why should he be regarded as evil, if at all?

My Answer, In Brief: Kant's philosophy cannot be the result of honest errors, and he did know, or ought to have known, of its destructive power. Hence, he should be regarded as evil, not merely mistaken.

Tags: Ethics, Judgment, Justice, Kant, Metaphysics, Philosophy

Listen or Download

Relevant Links

Comments

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on responding to expressions of hatred for work.

How should I respond when people disparage their work? Often, people make comments about the great burden that work is – not in the sense that they're unhappy with some problem in their current job, but that they resent the need to work at all. These are the kinds of people who live for weekends and vacations. I don't feel that way about my work, and I think these people are missing so much in life. How can I respond to such casual remarks in a way that might make the person re-think their attitude?

My Answer, In Brief: People often adopt such an attitude toward their work without thinking, and often just stating your own disagreement can shock people into rethinking what work might and ought to be.

Tags: Communication, Emotions, Ethics, Moral Wrongs, Productiveness, Work

Listen or Download

Watch Now

Comments

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on the morality of exploiting flaws in government lotteries.

Is it moral to exploit a design flaw in a government or private lottery? An

My Answer, In Brief: So long as you're playing by the rules, you're not cheating. However, you don't want to adopt the mindset of a cheater, nor harm yourself in some other way by exploiting this weakness.

Tags: Arbitrage, Ethics, Honesty, Integrity, Responsibility

Listen or Download

• Download: MP3 Segment
• Duration: 10:23

Comments

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on appropriating insulting terms.

What do you think of people using pejorative terms for themselves, such as gays referring to themselves as "faggots" or Objectivists calling themselves "Randroids"? The term "Randroid" is supposed to imply that Objectivists are unthinking, mindless drones. However, I happily use this term to describe myself – after first calling myself an Objectivist, of course – because I think it squashes a lot of the negativity behind the pejorative when I adopt it willingly. Do you think it's for good Objectivists to adopt this term – and more generally, for people to use insults as badges of honor?

My Answer, In Brief: To use insults ironically among people who understand the joke is unproblematic, but to simply describe oneself in insulting terms does not combat the insult but sanctions it – or demands a double standard.

Tags: Communication, Culture, Epistemology, GLBT, Justice, Language, Race

Listen or Download

Comments

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on dismissing arguments with pejorative language.

Is pejorative rhetoric useful? When should you or when may you describe someone's argument or analysis in pejorative terms, because you don't consider them intellectually honest or educable, and you just want to make it clear to the wider audience that you don't accept them as a worthwhile opponent? Is it acceptable to just vent in such cases?

My Answer, In Brief: A person should never just vent, and if you do, you're likely to look like the dishonest jerk unworthy of civilized discussion.

Tags: Communication, Epistemology, Ethics, Language

Listen or Download

Comments

Thank you for joining us for this episode! If you enjoyed this episode, please don't forget to contribute to contribute to our tip jar. Also, please don't forget to submit and vote on questions for upcoming broadcasts in in the question queue.