Q&A Webcast Episode: 3 July 2011
In this 3 July 2011 episode of Q&A Webcast, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered four questions on moral obligations of children to parents, the boundaries of proper self-defense, real life evil, reasons to donate blood, and more in an hour-long broadcast. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers was the audio co-host.
Remember, while Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free to produce: they require our time, effort, and money – week in and week out. So if you enjoy them, please contribute to our tip jar. We suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. You can contribute by PayPal to diana@philosophyinaction.com. If you prefer to send a check, please write "P/A" in the memo field and send it to "Diana Hsieh; P.O. Box 851; Sedalia, CO 80135."
My News of the Week: I've been working on programming for this webcast, as well as my updates to Explore Atlas Shrugged.
Listen Now 
- Duration: 1:09:03
Download the Episode 
Subscribe to the Feed
Share This Episode
Segments: 3 July 2011
Question 1: Moral Obligations of Children to Parents (3:49)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on moral obligations of children to parents.
Do kids have moral obligations to their parents? If so, what obligations and why?
My Answer, In Brief: Morality is self-motivating: a person should act virtuously in order to live and be happy. Hence, there are no unchosen, unconditional moral obligations (i.e. duties) to other people. Instead, moral obligations to others arise from our own choices, particularly from promises and agreements that we make with others – and that applies to children as well as adults.
Tags: Adult Children, Children, Ethics, Parenting
Listen or Download 
Comments
Question 2: The Boundaries of Proper Self-Defense (18:37)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on the boundaries of proper self-defense.
Is it moral to not defend yourself if you will get into legal trouble for doing so? As I understand laws on self-defense, you must be "in immediate danger of death or grievously bodily harm" in order to use lethal force. How is this reconciled with the morality of "shooting before he shoots you" or "hitting before you get hit"? In other words, preemptive attack may be seen as assault, but there might also be a threat of force. Is it moral to not defend yourself to avoid assault charges? In the case of using a gun to defend yourself, this could mean the difference between you dying at the hands of your attacker or living, but going to jail for murder. What should you do?
My Answer, In Brief: It is morally and legally proper to defend yourself, under certain conditions. As Boston T. Party explains, "Lethal force is valid only against a reasonably perceived immanent and grievous threat. The jury must agree that your assailant had the capability, opportunity, and obvious intent to immanently cause you at least grievous bodily harm.”
Tags: Ethics, Firearms, Law, Self-Defense
Listen or Download
Watch Now
Relevant Links
Comments
Question 3: Real Life Evil (34:57)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on real life evil.
Are people in real life as evil as in Ayn Rand's novel Atlas Shrugged? In Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand presents almost every bad person as very evil. I understand the purpose of that in the novel, but are their equivalents in real life (meaning the legislators passing similar laws nowadays) as evil as that – or are some of them just misguided or even stupid? In other words, do real-life people act on the death premise and hate the good for being the good? I just can't imagine that. Am I being too optimistic?
My Answer, In Brief: Evil is real — and not on sidelines today. But you can fight it and protect yourself from it.
Tags: Activism, Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand, Ethics, Evil, Judgment, Justice, Objectivism, Sanction
Listen or Download
Relevant Links
Comments
Question 4: Reasons to Donate Blood (45:02)
In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on reasons to donate blood.
What are the personal benefits of being a blood donor (or organ donor)? Is it worth doing under today's laws, where donors cannot get paid? Should people be able to trade blood and organs in a free market?
My Answer, In Brief: The primary reason to donate blood and organs is the value of other people to you and a desire for a well-stocked supply in case you or your loved ones are ever in need.
Tags: Benevolence, Ethics, Medicine, Politics
Listen or Download
Relevant Links
Comments
Rapid Fire Questions (52:46)
- If there was free trade in organs, do you think medical science have even more of an incentive to be creating artificial organs?
- What if your blood donation goes to support the life of an evil dictator?
- Should a person be more cautious about organ donation given the increasing government controls in medicine?
- Should gays be forbidden from donating blood?
- Why do you think that tattoos should be easily concealed?
- In the wake of the financial crisis, is more financial reform required?
- Why should women exit elevators before men?
- Should we be able to ask the "unaskable" questions on job interviews (such as on religion)?
Listen or Download
Comments
Conclusion (1:08:13)
Thank you for joining us for this episode! If you enjoyed this episode, please don't forget to contribute to contribute to our tip jar. Also, please don't forget to submit and vote on questions for upcoming broadcasts in in the question queue.
About Philosophy in Action Q&A Webcast
Every Sunday morning, philosopher Dr. Diana Hsieh answers four meaty questions applying rational principles to the challenges of real life in her live hour-long internet radio show, Philosophy in Action Advice Radio. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers co-hosts the show. The audience can ask follow-up questions and make comments in the text-based chat.
You can listen to Philosophy in Action broadcasts as podcasts by subscribing to the Philosophy in Action's Podcast RSS Feeds. Be sure to sign up for the Newsletter and connect on social media.
You can also peruse the show archives, listening to whole episodes or just selected segments. The show archives are sorted by date and by topic.
For regular updates, commentary, and humor from Dr. Diana Hsieh, visit her blog NoodleFood, and subscribe to its rss feed.
Dr. Diana Hsieh is a philosopher specializing in practical ethics. She received her Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 2009. Her dissertation argued that Thomas Nagel's "problem of moral luck" can be resolved by an Aristotelian theory of moral responsibility. She began podcasting in 2009, then webcasting in 2010.
Support Philosophy in Action
Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free for us to produce: they require our time, effort, and money. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to our tip jar!
If you'd like to make a one-time contribution in an amount not listed, use this link. For instructions on canceling or revising your monthly contribution, visit the support page.
Thank you, if you've contributed to our tip jar! You make our work possible, and we're so grateful for that! Also, whether you're able to contribute financially or not, we always appreciate your helping us spread the word about Philosophy in Action to anyone you think might be interested, as well as submitting and voting on questions for upcoming episodes.