Join philosopher Dr. Diana Hsieh for a lively hour-long broadcast in the next episode of Philosophy in Action Q&A Radio! She'll answer questions on warning others about dangerous people, explaining a firing, investment versus sacrifice, downloading music after hard drive failure, and more. The show will be broadcast live on Sunday, 20 May 2012, at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET. (Due to her travel schedule, Diana won't be broadcasting on Wednesday, May 23rd.)

Q&A Webcast Episode: 18 September 2011

In this 18 September 2011 episode of Q&A Webcast, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered four questions on the morality of torturing terrorists and criminals, feeling guilty for emotions, photocopying essays for study, extroversion versus second-handedness, and more in an hour-long broadcast. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers was the audio co-host.

Remember, while Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free to produce: they require our time, effort, and money – week in and week out. So if you enjoy them, please contribute to our tip jar. We suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. You can contribute by PayPal to diana@philosophyinaction.com. If you prefer to send a check, please write "P/A" in the memo field and send it to "Diana Hsieh; P.O. Box 851; Sedalia, CO 80135."

My News of the Week: I've been tending to Paul and programming the new web site for this webcast.

Listen Now

  • Duration: 1:01:38

Download the Episode

Subscribe to the Feed

Share This Episode


Segments: 18 September 2011


Question 1: The Morality of Torturing Terrorists and Criminals (3:03)

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on the morality of torturing terrorists and criminals.

Is it moral to torture criminals and/or terrorists? We supposedly were able to track down Osama Bin Laden with information obtained by torturing captured Al Qaeda prisoners. Is it moral to torture criminals, terrorists or other evildoers to gain useful information to fight crime or help win a war? If so, should there be any limits on when and how torture should be used by the government?

My Answer, In Brief: Torture can be moral, but only in clearly-defined contexts of defending against aggressors. The tricky question is whether it's an effective method or not for extracting information.

Tags: Crime, Ethics, Foreign Policy, Free Society, Law, Military, Politics, War

Listen or Download

Watch Now

Relevant Links

Comments


Question 2: Feeling Guilty for Emotions (24:20)

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on feeling guilty for emotions.

Should a person feel guilty about his emotions? Sometimes I feel emotions that I know are misplaced, such as envy at a co-worker's promotion or anger at a friend's mistake. What should my response be to these emotions? Should I feel guilty about them? Should I change them – and if so, how?

My Answer, In Brief: If you're caught up in a storm of emotions, you'll never be able to resolve emotional problems. Instead, introspect about the causes of your emotions, then distance yourself from wrong emotions by focusing on the facts.

Tags: Emotions, Ethics, Introspection, Psycho-Epistemology, Psychology

Listen or Download

Watch Now

Comments


Question 3: Photocopying Essays for Study (33:40)

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on photocopying essays for study.

Is it moral to photocopy an essay for a class or discussion group? My friend and I are starting a reading group at our university focused on philosophy, and the group will meet each week to discuss an essay or article related to philosophy. I want to use one of Ayn Rand's essays from The Virtue of Selfishness. I have purchased and own a copy the book. Is it moral for me to make photocopies of the essay for the purpose of the reading group – or would that violate copyright?

My Answer, In Brief: You have lots of options other than photocopying the essay: pursue them!

Tags: Ethics, Intellectual Property, Law

Listen or Download

Comments


Question 4: Extroversion Versus Second-Handedness (38:29)

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a question on extroversion versus second-handedness.

What's the difference between extroversion and second-handedness? According to Wikipedia, extroversion is "the act, state, or habit of being predominantly concerned with and obtaining gratification from what is outside the self." A key distinction between introverts and extroverts is that extroverts mentally "recharge" by interacting with other people, while introverts do that by being alone. Does being an extrovert mean that you're second-handed? Is it a moral failing of any kind?

My Answer, In Brief: Extroversion concerns a person's base personality, whereas second-handeness is a matter of cultivated moral character. These are totally different things!

Tags: Ethics, Independence, Personality, Psychology

Listen or Download

Relevant Links

Comments


Rapid Fire Questions (41:33)

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered a variety of questions off-the-cuff. The questions were:
  • What's the difference between staying poor and Going Galt?
  • Are service professions second-handed or altruistic, since you're not producing anything tangible but instead focused primarily on serving others?
  • Shouldn't justice matter more than your own personal happiness?
  • Since selfishness is natural, why bother telling people to do it more?
  • Isn't everyone selfish, as a matter of human nature?
  • Shouldn't ethics be about restraining self-interest, rather than indulging in it?
  • What's the point of living if just for yourself?
  • Won't your interests conflict with the interests of others?
  • Why did Ayn Rand reject cryonics?
  • Is public nudity immoral?

Listen or Download

Comments


Conclusion (1:00:23)

Thank you for joining us for this episode! If you enjoyed this episode, please don't forget to contribute to contribute to our tip jar. Also, please don't forget to submit and vote on questions for upcoming broadcasts in in the question queue.


About Philosophy in Action Q&A Webcast

Every Sunday morning, philosopher Dr. Diana Hsieh answers four meaty questions applying rational principles to the challenges of real life in her live hour-long internet radio show, Philosophy in Action Advice Radio. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers co-hosts the show. The audience can ask follow-up questions and make comments in the text-based chat.

You can listen to Philosophy in Action broadcasts as podcasts by subscribing to the Philosophy in Action's Podcast RSS Feeds. Be sure to sign up for the Newsletter and connect on social media.

You can also peruse the show archives, listening to whole episodes or just selected segments. The show archives are sorted by date and by topic.

For regular updates, commentary, and humor from Dr. Diana Hsieh, visit her blog NoodleFood, and subscribe to its rss feed.

Dr. Diana Hsieh is a philosopher specializing in practical ethics. She received her Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 2009. Her dissertation argued that Thomas Nagel's "problem of moral luck" can be resolved by an Aristotelian theory of moral responsibility. She began podcasting in 2009, then webcasting in 2010.

Philosophy in Action's Newsletter Philosophy in Action's Facebook Page Philosophy in Action's Twitter Stream Philosophy in Action's RSS Feed Philosophy in Action's YouTube Channel

Support Philosophy in Action

Philosophy in Action's broadcasts are available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing them, but they're not free for us to produce: they require our time, effort, and money. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to our tip jar!



If you'd like to make a one-time contribution in an amount not listed, use this link. For instructions on canceling or revising your monthly contribution, visit the support page.

Thank you, if you've contributed to our tip jar! You make our work possible, and we're so grateful for that! Also, whether you're able to contribute financially or not, we always appreciate your helping us spread the word about Philosophy in Action to anyone you think might be interested, as well as submitting and voting on questions for upcoming episodes.