Many Christians would watch this music video of kids urging respect for and obedience to authority with some measure of alarm.

Many Christians, after all, want their children to think and judge for themselves, not to mindlessly obey their parents, teachers, and ministers. And they’re right — not only because some adults are unworthy of trust — but also because they recognize in some way that independence is a virtue.

Yet in so doing, Christians are rejecting scripture in favor of plain old good common sense. Scripture is clear — from the story of Abraham and Isaac to that of Doubting Thomas that faith in and obedience to authorities is morally required — even when they demand that you believe ridiculous tales and perform unspeakable acts. In fact, such is the explicit advice of given by the Apostle Paul to Christians in Romans 13:

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God, and those authorities that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists authority resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgement. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Do you wish to have no fear of the authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive its approval; for it is God’s servant for your good. But if you do what is wrong, you should be afraid, for the authority does not bear the sword in vain! It is the servant of God to execute wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be subject, not only because of wrath but also because of conscience.

Remember that, next time you hear of a priest molesting a child or dictator slaughtering his people. Or worse, apply the following advice from 1 Peter 2 to those cases:

Slaves, accept the authority of your masters with all deference, not only those who are kind and gentle but also those who are harsh. For it is to your credit if, being aware of God, you endure pain while suffering unjustly. If you endure when you are beaten for doing wrong, where is the credit in that? But if you endure when you do right and suffer for it, you have God’s approval. For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you should follow in his steps.

Do you think that Christianity offers help and solace to innocent people, unjustly downtrodden by the powerful? Think again!

Apr 222011

In this video, Ari Armstrong of Free Colorado delves into the deeper meaning of a “Horcrux” in Harry Potter by contrasting it with that of the Christian cross, then explaining why the latter does not represent the values in the novel. It’s well-worth watching, as I’d never noticed the parallels he explains here so clearly.

On a related note, Ari just released an expanded version of his excellent book Values of Harry Potter. Here’s his tour through the book:

The release of the Expanded Edition of my book Values of Harry Potter offers a good opportunity for me to walk people through the book.

In the Introduction, I quickly review my own history with the Potter series and introduce the main topics of the original edition. I also summarize my take on the religious themes of J. K. Rowling’s novels: “Some people argue that the books should be avoided because they oppose Christianity. Others argue that the books should be read and praised because they promote Christian themes. My claim is that the Christian elements of the Potter books are real but disconnected from the broader moral themes of the books.”

Chapter One, “The Heroic Fight for Values,” first discusses the major values that Harry Potter and his allies pursue: their lives and the lives of loved ones, their liberty, and their ability to live and work in peace. In contrast, “all the villains achieve is misery and self-destruction;” they destroy the values that make life worth living. The last part of the chapter, “Values in the Face of Death,” reviews the stories of Lily protecting Harry with her life, Dumbledore doing the same for Draco, and Harry confronting Voldemort thinking he’ll die in the process. I argue that these cases, too, illustrate the heroes acting heroically for their values.

Chapter Two, “Independence: Mark of the Hero,” explores the virtue of independence in Rowling’s heroes and the vice of dependence (or, to invoke Ayn Rand’s term, second-handedness) in the villains. Independence in this context means approaching “all of life…according to one’s own considered judgment of the facts,” not “ignoring others, disdaining them, avoiding their company, or rejecting their help.” Key examples of the second-handed approach are the Dursleys and Gilderoy Lockhart. The section, “Second-Handers and Power,” discusses how power-lusters such as Minister Fudge, Dolores Umbridge, and Voldemort himself embody the second-hand mentality. By contrast, the heroes of the novels, particularly Dobby, Hermione, and Harry, maintain a fierce independence.

Chapter Three, “Free Will: ‘It Matters Not What Someone Is Born,’” considers the similarities and differences between Harry and Voldemort. “Rowling shows that choice is key” to the very different paths they travel. The chapter also reviews the cases of Sirius Black and Severus Snape as illustrations of the power of free will. However, free will also has its limits, and the chapter explores these as well, as illustrated by the cases of Ariana (Dumbledore’s sister), Merope (Voldemort’s mother), and the house elf Kreacher.

Chapter Four, “The Clash of Love and Sacrifice,” grows more critical. Is Lily’s act of protecting Harry an example of sacrificial love in the Christian tradition? Invoking the wisdom of Aristotle, I argue that it is not; instead, Lily acts to protect her most cherished value. Though Rowling herself injects Christian symbolism into her stories, her characters actually show that they act in pursuit of their own values, and calling that “sacrifice” makes little sense. The chapter also considers the cases of Ron “sacrificing” himself on the chess board, Harry rescuing his enemies, and Dumbledore caring for his sister.

Chapter Five, “Materialism and Immortality,” examines the significance of the Horcrux, an object of great evil. Central to the plot of the novels is Harry’s quest to destroy Voldemort’s Horcruxes. I argue that, while Rowling suggests belief in an immortal soul is necessary for virtue, her characters actually demonstrate otherwise.

For the Conclusion to the original edition, “Mischief Managed,” I discuss Rowling’s work as an example of Romantic literature. I argue, “The deeper magic of Harry Potter flows through our world, too.”

Part Three: Additional Essays consists of eight essays new to the Expanded Edition.

The Psychology of Harry Potter reviews Rowling’s experience with depression and relates it to the dementors of the novels. The essay goes on to explore the psychological significance of boggarts, the Mirror of Erised, the Resurrection Stone, and the scar that Voldemort gives Harry.

Wizard Law and Segregation reviews the various roles that government plays in the novels. In brief, the government protects wizards from harm, oppresses other races (which the heroes condemn), and regulates various behaviors. Notably, Rowling creates a world in which wizards forcibly segregate themselves from Muggles, something that seems at odds with Rowling’s broader themes of political liberty.

News Media in Harry Potter counters criticism of the novels’ treatment of journalism. I argue that Rowling actually presents a “constructive view of journalism within the series.” I conclude, “The novels encourage readers to critically examine claims, regardless of their source, for internal consistency and adherence to the facts. Most importantly, the series urges readers to fight for the truth.”

The final five essays review The Tales of Beedle the Bard, contrast Rowling’s use of magic with the magic of fantasy writers J. R. R. Tolkien and Lloyd Alexander, recount “Harry Potter’s Lessons for Muggle Politicians,” discuss some similarities between Rowling and Ayn Rand, and review the Potter films.

If this seems interesting to you, I invite you to read my entire book!

I’ve not yet read the expanded edition of the book, but I really enjoyed the original version. In case you missed it before, here’s the endorsement that I wrote for the original edition:

I’ve read all the Harry Potter novels multiple times, discussed them at length with friends, read essays analyzing them, and even published an essay of my own. Yet Ari Armstrong’s Values of Harry Potter offered me a delightful array of fresh insights into J. K. Rowling’s works. It offers fans of Harry Potter a unique opportunity to explore the core values of the novels, to discover why we find them so captivating and so inspiring. Readers will develop a deeper appreciation for Rowling’s achievement in portraying life-loving, courageous heroes. They will discover compelling answers to any half-formed questions and doubts about the significance of her Christian themes. When I re-read the Harry Potter series — as I’m eager to do again — I will gain far more insight and inspiration from them than ever before, thanks to Values of Harry Potter.

If that sounds interesting, you can buy the paperback for $14.99 or the Kindle edition for $8.99.

Note to Appease the FTC Thugs: Ari sent me a free copy of this new edition of his book. That, plus our criminal history together in Mexico, is my sole reason for this blog post. Granted, any commissions earned from purchases thereof goes to Greg Perkins, my other partner in crime, due to Colorado’s Amazon Tax. However, I’d find some way around that were it not for that Las Vegas caper involving the hooker, the truck driver, and the one-handed midget little person. He knows too much, dammit!

The Apocalypse

 Posted by on 8 March 2002 at 9:49 am  Christianity, Cloning, Religion, Religious Right
Mar 082002

Peggy Noonan apparently thinks that cloning will bring on the apocalypse, as she indicates in the second section of this piece. As she says “God is not mocked.”

Strangely enough, it only gets worse.

And, just for fun *pbbbbbt* to God!

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha