May 062013
 

Mental Floss posted a list of “contronyms” or “self-antonyms,” namely words that mean their own opposite. Here are a few of my favorites:

1. Sanction (via French, from Latin sanctio(n-), from sancire ‘ratify,’) can mean ‘give official permission or approval for (an action)’ or conversely, ‘impose a penalty on.’

3. Left can mean either remaining or departed. If the gentlemen have withdrawn to the drawing room for after-dinner cigars, who’s left? (The gentlemen have left and the ladies are left.)

4. Dust, along with the next two words, is a noun turned into a verb meaning either to add or to remove the thing in question. Only the context will tell you which it is. When you dust are you applying dust or removing it? It depends whether you’re dusting the crops or the furniture.

10. Fast can mean “moving rapidly,” as in “running fast,” or ‘fixed, unmoving,’ as in “holding fast.” If colors are fast they will not run. The meaning ‘firm, steadfast’ came first. The adverb took on the sense ‘strongly, vigorously,’ which evolved into ‘quickly,’ a meaning that spread to the adjective.

Another strange category of words that I love seem to be called “autoholonyms.” Basically, these are words which refer to both the species and the genus. Here are some examples:

  • “Cow” can be mean just female bovines or all bovines.
  • “Day” can mean a 24 hour period or just the light portions thereof.
  • “Man” can refer to all humans (contrast: animals) or just male humans (contrast: woman) or just adult male humans (contrast: boy).

Can you think of other common words that fit that pattern? I want to know more!


Share This Post

Punctuating Sexual Desire

 Posted by on 15 April 2013 at 2:00 pm  Funny, Language
Apr 152013
 

Oh, my… the question of how to properly punctuate sexual desire is indeed a tricky (and damn funny) one. Here’s a tidbit:

Technically, you could fix this with a semicolon….

“You smell so good; it’s making me stupid.”

In some ways this is the right thing to do. A semicolon is the official way to show two independent clauses have a close relationship to each other.

Here’s the problem: Semicolons are for wankers. Seriously. You can go your whole life without ever needing to really use a semicolon.

Unless you’re an academic, of course. If you’re an academic, you’ve got to use semicolon to impress other wankers with how much of a wanker you are so you can get your paper published. You know, that paper you wrote detailing your in-depth Marxist interpretation of the last eight lines of John Donne’s “The Flea?” The paper where you used the word “moreover” twenty-seven times in eleven pages?

Most importantly, a semicolon looks really strange in a piece of casual dialogue. People don’t speak using semicolons. Unless they’re wankers.

I love semicolons… but colons are even more fabulously wankerish!


Share This Post

Backuping the Computer

 Posted by on 12 February 2013 at 2:00 pm  Computers, Funny, Language
Feb 122013
 

A recent conversation Chez Hsieh:

Me to Paul: It’s not a problem, the computer is backuping right now…. backuping… backuping…” Paul: “You mean ‘backing up’?” Me: “YES. Backing up.”


Share This Post

New Word

 Posted by on 22 January 2013 at 10:00 am  Funny, Language
Jan 222013
 

I’ve been playing lots of Scrabble on my iPad lately, and I found myself with these letters recently:

“DIANAER” should be a word. It would mean, “BEWARE: like Diana, only more so.”


Share This Post

The Church of Proper English

 Posted by on 10 January 2013 at 2:00 pm  Funny, Language
Jan 102013
 

Imagine that you’re writing a message to a philosophy Ph.D such as myself… well, let’s just say that this is not the message that you should write:

Sweet Jesus. Might I recommend worship at the Church of Proper English, first and foremost?


Share This Post

Another Crazy Gem

 Posted by on 25 July 2012 at 2:00 pm  Funny, Language, WTF
Jul 252012
 

I get the best nutty comments, I tell you! This gem was posted on this post of Philosophy in Action’s Facebook Page:

Really, just try reading the whole thing from beginning to end. I dare you!

Even better, she posted a few follow-up comments in response to others, including:

Language and grammar are also topics that have generally been widely debated, it may be interesting to me to see how others would correct my sentences sometimes or rewrite them for me, that would not offend me, if you can write what I write better than I can then you should show me that way I can learn from it.

Um, okay!


Share This Post

I Love Hores Too

 Posted by on 19 June 2012 at 3:00 pm  Children, Funny, Language
Jun 192012
 

Oh, the difference that an S makes!


Share This Post

The Hokey Pokey by William Shakespeare

 Posted by on 30 May 2012 at 2:00 pm  Funny, Language, Literature
May 302012
 

“The Hokey Pokey,” as if written by William Shakespeare:

O proud left foot, that ventures quick within Then soon upon a backward journey lithe. Anon, once more the gesture, then begin: Command sinistral pedestal to writhe. Commence thou then the fervid Hokey-Poke, A mad gyration, hips in wanton swirl. To spin! A wilde release from Heavens yoke. Blessed dervish! Surely canst go, girl. The Hoke, the poke — banish now thy doubt Verily, I say, ’tis what it’s all about.

I couldn’t find a proper source for this bit of awesome, but it’s often attributed to Jeff Brechlin. If anyone knows more, I’d love to hear it in the comments!


Share This Post

The Etymology of “Boob”

 Posted by on 26 April 2012 at 2:00 pm  Funny, Language
Apr 262012
 

Around the time when I answered my webcast question on public breastfeeding, the following fabulously funny image was floating around Facebook. Happily, multiple people posted it on my wall, and it gave me a giggle every time.


Share This Post

Two Plans to Improve English Orthography

 Posted by on 17 April 2012 at 8:00 am  Funny, Language
Apr 172012
 

First, the plan commonly attributed to either Mark Twain or M. J. Shields:

For example, in Year 1 that useless letter “c” would be dropped to be replased either by “k” or “s”, and likewise “x” would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which “c” would be retained would be the “ch” formation, which will be dealt with later.

Year 2 might reform “w” spelling, so that “which” and “one” would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish “y” replasing it with “i” and Iear 4 might fiks the “g/j” anomali wonse and for all.

Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants.

Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez “c”, “y” and “x” — bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez — tu riplais “ch”, “sh”, and “th” rispektivli.

Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.

Second, the plan to turn English into German. (I remember seeing this forwarded via e-mail when I was in college, and I’m delighted to have found it again!)

The European Commission have just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the EU rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty’s government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5 year phase in plan that would be known as “EuroEnglish”:

In the first year, “s” will replace the soft “c”– Sertainly this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard “c” will be dropped in favor of the “k”. This should klear up konfusion and keyboards kan have 1 less letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year, when the troublesome “ph” wil be replaced with the “f”. This will make words like “fotograf” 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expected to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkorage the removal of double letters, which have always been a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horible mes of the silent “e”‘s in the language is disgraceful, and they should go away.

By the 4th yar peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing “th” with “z” and “w” with “v”. During ze fifz yar, ze unesesary “o” kan be dropd from vords kontaining “ou” and similar changes vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters. After zis fifz yer, ve vil hav a reli sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubls or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech ozer.

ZE DREM VIL FINALI KUM TRU

Ha! English spelling rawks!


Share This Post

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha