Note from Diana Hsieh, 22 Feb 2012
If you’ve come to this page via “Checking Premises” or something similar, please note that I’ve written a length commentary on the criticisms circulating about me, including explaining my views of various controversial matters, in this post: On Some Recent Controversies. I’d recommend reading that, then judging me based on my full range of work, not just a few out-of-context snippets. If you have any questions, please feel free to e-mail me privately at diana@dianahsieh.com.
On Sunday, I hosted another episode of my live Rationally Selfish Webcast, where I answered questions from viewers on practical ethics and the principles of living well. The live webcasts are held every Sunday at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET. Normally, the webcast consists of me broadcasting on video, Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers on audio, and the audience in a text chat. However, since we were broadcasting live from ATLOSCon, Tim Peck kindly substituted for Greg.
As usual, an audio recording of Sunday’s live webcast is now available as a NoodleCast podcast. To get these podcasts automatically, you can subscribe to the feed in iTunes — just choose either the enhanced M4A format or the standard MP3 format. They’re the same content, but the M4A format breaks each question into its own “chapter.”
While the Rationally Selfish Webcast (and Podcast) is available to anyone free of charge, it’s not free for us to produce. It requires time, effort, and expense. So if you enjoy it, please contribute to our tip jar. We suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated.
If you prefer to send a check, please write “RS Webcast” in the memo field and send it to “Diana Hsieh; P.O. Box 851; Sedalia, CO 80135.”
Whether you contribute or not, please do submit and vote on questions on the widget on the page for the Rationally Selfish Webcast — or via Idea Informer.
The Video
The full video for the webcast is only available to live attendees. Now, you can listen and/or download the audio podcast. However, I’ll post my favorite segment or two of video to my YouTube channel later this week.
The Podcast
Listen Now
- Duration: 1:00:46
Download the Episode
- Download the Enhanced M4A File (27.9 MB)
- Download the Standard MP3 File (28.6 MB)
Subscribe to the Feed
- Subscribe to the Enhanced M4A Feed in iTunes or in your RSS reader
- Subscribe to the Standard MP3 Feed in iTunes or in your RSS reader
In This Episode
The following segments are marked as chapters in the M4A version of the podcast. Thanks to Tammy Perkins for helping compile the show notes!
Introduction (0:00)
Current Projects:
- It’s just AtlosCon 2011!
Question 1: The Rights of the Severely Mentally Disabled (2:41)What rights do severely mentally disabled people have? If someone is mentally disabled to the extent that he or she will never be able to be rational and/or live independently, does that person have rights? Who should be financially responsible for the care of such people? My Answer, In Brief: A disabled person with some capacity to reason has rights, although may require the guidance and assistance of a guardian. However, humans born without any capacity to reason (such as anencephalics) cannot be said to have rights, since rights protect a person’s capacity to act on his own rational judgment.Question 2: The Morality of Risky Sports (21:31)Are risky sports immoral? Some people engage in highly risky sports, such as freestyle skiing or snowboarding, mountain climbing in extreme conditions, surfing huge waves, skydiving, free (non-scuba) diving, super-technical mountain biking, and so on. Since life is the standard of value, is it wrong to risk your life (or limbs) in such pursuits? Should a person take pleasure in risks for its own sake? What is the value of such sports, if any?My Answer, In Brief: While the pursuit of risk per se is self-destructive, most extreme athletes have the skills required to safely perform the activity or risk only minor injuries.Question 3: Francisco’s Slap of Dagny in Atlas Shrugged (33:16)Was Francisco justified in slapping Dagny? In their teenage years, when Dagny asked Francisco whether she should try to get D’s in order to gain popularity in school, Francisco slapped her. I understand what he meant by the “unspeakable” thing that she said. But couldn’t have he talked it over with her instead of slapping her — and shouldn’t he have done so? Why does he use physical violence — and why does Dagny not just accept but relish in it?My Answer, In Brief: The slap in question was not just deliberately provoked, but necessary in the context of fiction to dramatize the conflict.Question 4: The “Rape” Scene in The Fountainhead (37:49)Should a man ever act in real life as Howard Roark did in his first sexual encounter with Dominique? In your April 24th webcast, you said that a person should not act as Howard Roark did in the “rape” scene in The Fountainhead, implying it would be immoral. Could you explain why? Is the problem that you cannot know for certain what the woman wants? I’ve slept with a few women and only once have I ever been 100% certain that she wanted it that way and so I took it without any real permission and I was right. She even told me later she wouldn’t have wanted it any other way. I understand it is very dangerous to say to guys, “Hey, its okay to do this!” because most people are idiots, but wouldn’t there be rare real-life cases in which a man would be right to act like Roark did? My Answer, In Brief: The “rape” scene is wonderful drama, but to do the same in real life would risk actually raping the woman — which is not merely horrible in and of itself, but also likely to result in years of imprisonment.Links:
- “Understanding the ‘Rape’ Scene in The Fountainhead” by Andy Berstein in Essays on Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead
Question 5: Accepting Unauthorized Discounts (44:58)Is it moral to accept discounts for products and services when the person giving you the discount isn’t a manager or owner of the business? Is it moral for a person to accept “nice face” discounts? I’ve had people (mostly women) tell me that they’ve received discounts or better service for being nice, dressing in low-cut shirts or short skirts, being cheerful or otherwise friendly to store clerks or employees (usually of the opposite sex). Is it moral to offer or accept such discounts?My Answer, In Brief: Businesses are free to offer discounts to any customers, and you should feel free to accept them. However, if you know that the discount is offered in secret, without the permission of the business owner or manager, you should refuse.Question 6: Objectivist Answers: Buying Votes in Elections (52:00)Should it be legal in a free society to buy votes? It doesn’t seem that the practice would violate anyone’s rights, so shouldn’t it be legal for a person who wants to hold office to pay willing voters to cast their vote for him?My Answer, In Brief: To buy votes in an election would not only be wildly expensive but also likely ensure defeat. It’s not an activity that could or should be banned.Conclusion (59:40)Comments or questions? Contact us!
- Diana Hsieh: DianaHsieh.com: diana@RationallySelfish.com
- Tim Peck: Et in Arcadia ego
If you enjoyed this episode, please don’t forget to contribute to our tip jar! Also, remember to submit and vote on questions in the the ongoing question queue!


