On Sunday, 21 October 2012, I broadcast a new episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, answering questions on federal versus state and local government, parenting via empty threats, reasons for everything, and more. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers was the episode’s co-host.

If you missed the live broadcast, you can listen to audio podcasts of selected questions or the whole episode. You’ll find those posted below, as well as on this episode’s archive page: Q&A Radio: 21 October 2012.

To automatically download every new episode, just subscribe to the Philosophy in Action Podcast RSS Feed in your music player:

Q&A Radio: Episode: 21 October 2012

The Whole Episode

My News of the Week: I’ve been setting up Paul’s old MacBookPro after destroying my laptop, and I’ve been working on repairing the fencing for our horse pastures. I’ll be speaking on the conflict between Christianity and capitalism in Boulder on Monday evening.

Listen or Download:

You can also download or listen to particular questions from this episode.

Question 1: Federal Versus State and Local Government (5:11)

In this segment, I answered a question on federal versus state and local government.

Is it proper for state or local government to enact laws that a federal government should not? A proper government is one that fulfills and is limited to the role of protecting citizens from initiations of force by other individuals or other nations. However, in a free and proper society, is it proper for local and state governments to enact laws that go beyond the proper functions of a federal government? For example, in a properly-governed United States, could states enact certain laws that regulate behavior beyond what the federal government could enact, perhaps based on the religious or other values held by most people in that community – on the assumption that any person who disagreed could leave the area?

My Answer, In Brief: The primary goal of all levels and branches of government must be to respect and protect rights. To do that, government should be divided into local, state, and national levels, each with different functions. That way, individuals have more political influence, government can be more responsive to local conditions, law can be developed by inductive experimentation, and the power of any one level of government is checked by the others.

Listen or Download:

Tags: Crime, Free Society, Government, Induction, Law, Politics, Rights, State’s Rights

Relevant Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 2: Parenting Via Empty Threats (40:22)

In this segment, I answered a question on parenting via empty threats.

Should parents make empty threats to their children? At the grocery store last week, I heard a mother threaten to throw away her daughter’s favorite toys unless the daughter behaved. That seems to be pretty common: parents make empty threats in an attempt to scare their kids into better behavior. They’ll say that it works, and perhaps it does. But what are the consequences? Are such empty threats a valid parenting technique?

My Answer, In Brief: For a parent to use empty threats to manipulate his child into obedience means destroying his own credibility – and often doing so is downright malicious.

Listen or Download:

Tags: Character, Children, Honesty, Manipulation, Obedience, Parenting, Punishment

Relevant Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 3: Reasons for Everything (53:13)

In this segment, I answered a question on reasons for everything.

Does everything happen for a reason? When confronted with some unwelcome turn of events, many people tell themselves that “everything happens for a reason.” What does that mean – and is it true? Is it harmless – or does believing that have negative effects on a person’s life?

My Answer, In Brief: Everything has a cause, but not everything has a reason. The universe is not run by any deity or force with some greater purpose in mind. To believe that it does begets evasion, apathy, and evil.

Listen or Download:

Tags: Causality, Ethics, Evil, Religion, Responsibility

Relevant Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Rapid Fire Questions (1:00:36)

In this segment, Dr. Diana Hsieh answered questions impromptu. The questions were:

  • What do you think of Robert Heinlein’s advice on voting: There may not be a candidate worth voting for, but there sure is a candidate worth voting against?
  • Do you know if James Taggart’s marriage to Cheryl, resulting in her suicide, is a parallel drawn from Dostoevsky’s marriage to a peasant girl because he felt sorry for her, resulting in her suicide?
Listen or Download:

To comment on these questions or my answers, visit its comment thread.

Conclusion (1:04:30)

Thank you for joining us for this episode! If you enjoyed this episode, please contribute to contribute to our tip jar. Also, please submit and vote on questions for upcoming shows in in the question queue.

Support Philosophy in Action

Support
Our Work
Remember, Philosophy in Action Radio is available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing these radio shows, but they’re not free to produce: they require our time, effort, and money – week in and week out. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to our tip jar! You can send your contribution via Dwolla, PayPal, or US Mail.

Follow Philosophy in Action

Philosophy in Action's NewsletterPhilosophy in Action's Facebook PagePhilosophy in Action's Twitter StreamPhilosophy in Action's RSS FeedPhilosophy in Action's YouTube Channel

   
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha