Nov 122012
 

On Sunday’s episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, Greg Perkins and I answered questions on the 2012 election results, explaining a break-up, keeping contact with questionable family, and more. The podcast of that episode is now available for streaming or downloading.

You can automatically download podcasts of Philosophy in Action Radio by subscribing to Philosophy in Action’s Podcast RSS Feed:


Whole Podcast: 11 November 2012

Listen or Download:

Remember the Tip Jar!

The mission of Philosophy in Action is to spread rational principles for real life… far and wide. That’s why the vast majority of my work is available to anyone, free of charge. I love doing the radio show, but each episode requires an investment of time, effort, and money to produce. So if you enjoy and value that work of mine, please contribute to the tip jar. I suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. In return, contributors can request that I answer questions from the queue pronto, and regular contributors enjoy free access to premium content and other goodies.


Podcast Segments: 11 November 2012

You can download or listen to my answers to individual questions from this episode below.

Introduction

My News of the Week: On Saturday, I spoke at a Liberty on the Rocks Workshop on the virtues required for free society, particularly honesty, productiveness, and justice.

Question 1: The 2012 Election Results

Question: What should we think of the results of the 2012 election? Many free-market advocates are despairing over the election results, particularly the re-election of President Obama. They claim that America has sunk to a new low in re-electing an openly socialistic and egalitarian hater of America. Do you think that such despair is warranted? Also, how can intellectuals, activists, and others effectively promote individual rights over the next four years?

My Answer, In Brief: Advocates of free markets need to stop despairing and start thinking about how to make progress over the next four years.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 2: Explaining a Break-Up

Question: Do I owe my boyfriend an explanation for my breaking up with him? I dated my recently-ex-boyfriend for a few months. Over the past few weeks, I realized that some personality and value differences preclude any long-term prospects. When I broke up with him, I didn’t give him any reasons why, and that really upset him. Do I owe him an explanation? Would that help or hurt our chances of a cordial relationship in the future? If I should talk to him about my reasons, what should I say?

My Answer, In Brief: If your former boyfriend is a decent person, then it’s wrong not to honor his request for an explanation for the break-up: given your past intimacy, it’s cruel to leave him in the dark.

Listen or Download:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 3: Keeping Contact with Questionable Family

Question: Should I keep in contact with my morally questionable and mystical father? Recently, I initiated contact with my father. I’ve not seen or spoken to him for most of my life. He left behind a lot of damage, and I was very hurt by that. I made amends with him, thinking that he was in recovery. However, I recently discovered his eastern mystic philosophy. Also, although he is fully recovered, he still has moral problems. Now I’m second guessing my decision. Would it be immoral for me to break off the contact with him after I’ve made peace with him? Should I preserve the relationship to keep my character intact? Or should I cut ties with him, on the principle that I should only maintain relationships of value to me?

My Answer, In Brief: The critical question to ask is whether you can establish a relationship with your father that enriches your life and happiness. That requires having realistic standards, as well as some honest conversation with him.

Listen or Download:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Rapid Fire Questions

Questions:

  • Why do you think men tend to gravitate more towards rationalism than women?
  • Regarding the third question, should the questioner tell the father “I decided I need to practice non-attachment, so good bye”?
  • Is there a rational concept of honor or is honor an empty sack worth the sack?

Listen or Download:

  • Start Time: 1:02:03
  • Duration: 5:00
  • Download: MP3 Segment

To comment on these questions or my answers, visit its comment thread.

Conclusion

Be sure to check out the topics scheduled for upcoming episodes! Don’t forget to submit and vote on questions for future episodes too!

  • Start Time: 1:07:03


About Philosophy in Action Radio

Philosophy in Action Radio focuses on the application of rational principles to the challenges of real life. It broadcasts live on most Sunday mornings and many Thursday evenings over the internet. For information on upcoming shows, visit the Episodes on Tap. For podcasts of past shows, visit the Show Archives.

Philosophy in Action's NewsletterPhilosophy in Action's Facebook PagePhilosophy in Action's Twitter StreamPhilosophy in Action's RSS FeedsPhilosophy in Action's Calendar


  • Allen

    Thank you for your remarkably sane commentary on the election results. I was beginning to think that a majority of Objectivists are permanent residences of Bill Maher’s conservative bubble.

   
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha