On Sunday, 18 November 2012, I broadcast a new episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, answering questions on adopting ideas by default, griping versus moral judgment, veganism as child abuse, sharing lecture notes, and more. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers was the episode’s co-host.

If you missed the live broadcast, you can listen to the audio podcast any time. You’ll find the podcast on the episode’s archive page, as well as below.

To automatically download every new episode, just subscribe to the Philosophy in Action Podcast RSS Feed in your music player:

Q&A Radio: Episode: 18 November 2012

The Whole Episode

My News of the Week: I’ve been working on updates to NoodleFood, plus preparing my dissertation for publication!

Listen or Download:

You can also download or listen to particular questions from this episode.

Question 1: Adopting Ideas by Default (2:45)

In this segment, I answered a question on adopting ideas by default.

Should a person allow his ideology to set his default positions? When people adopt a religion, philosophy, or politics as their own, they often don’t think through every issue – or they’ve not done so yet. Does accepting the various positions of that ideology as a kind of default amount to accepting them on faith? What should a person do when he hasn’t thought through the issue for himself?

My Answer, In Brief: A person should not swallow any ideology whole. He should judge for himself on matters of importance, and he needs to differentiate what he knows first-hand from merely provisional and plausible claims.

Listen or Download:

Tags: Conservatism, Epistemology, Ethics, Honesty, Independence, Paleo, Philosophy, Psycho-Epistemology, Rationalism, Rationality

Relevant Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 2: Griping Versus Moral Judgment (22:57)

In this segment, I answered a question on griping versus moral judgment.

What’s the difference between griping about people and morally judging them? I try to be careful in my moral judgments of others, and then act accordingly. However, most people don’t seem to do that: they bitch about other people out of annoyance, but then do nothing to solve their problems. What’s wrong with such bitching? How can I explain my objections to such bitching in a friendly way? How can I avoid being bitched-to or bitched-about?

My Answer, In Brief: For a person to merely gripe about serious moral failings in others but then maintain the relationship as before is wrong. Yet it’s far worse to bandy about serious but unwarranted moral accusations out of momentary annoyance or spite.

Listen or Download:

Tags: Communication, Ethics, Justice, Relationships

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 3: Veganism as Child Abuse (39:19)

In this segment, I answered a question on veganism as child abuse.

Should it be considered child abuse to feed a child a vegan diet? Most experts agree that children need some of the nutrients found in meat and dairy products to develop properly. I’ve read lots of stories about children whose development is impaired or stunted due to being fed a vegan diet. Should it be considered child abuse to feed a child a strict vegan diet? If so, at which point should the state intervene and take legal recourse against the parents?

My Answer, In Brief: Child abuse requires that parents inflict serious and lasting harm on the child that impairs its capacity to develop into healthy, independent, autonomous adult. A vegan diet might do that – in which case the state should intervene. Or it might be perfectly fine – in which case the state should leave the parents and child alone.

Listen or Download:

Tags: Child Abuse, Children, Free Society, Health, Law, Parenting, Rights

Relevant Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 4: Sharing Lecture Notes (49:22)

In this segment, I answered a question on sharing lecture notes.

Is it wrong to refuse to share lecture notes with a lazy student? A classmate of mine is nice enough but a bit odd. She’s always at least 30 minutes late for lecture, and she doesn’t come to lab sometimes. In lecture, she does not take notes but instead usually draws the whole class period. Today, she asked to borrow some of my lecture notes. I told her that I noticed that she was always late and that she didn’t take notes, and she denied that. Still, I told her that lending her my notes would be inconvenient, then I suggested that she ask someone else. Normally, I’d be happy to share my notes, but in this case, I didn’t want to share the results of my efforts in attending this class on time, every day, and paying attention. Was that wrong?

My Answer, In Brief: To offer notes to a fellow student is often generous and proper, if it’s not too much trouble. However, in this case, the student was not merely lazy but also dishonest, so sharing your notes would have been wrong.

Listen or Download:

Tags: Communication, Culture, Education, Ethics, Free Society, Generosity, Honesty, Moral Wrongs, Responsibility

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Rapid Fire Questions (1:00:59)

In this segment, I answered questions impromptu. The questions were:

  • I have Bipolar Disorder. When is a good time in a new romantic relationship to inform the other person of that?
  • What lesson did the Republicans learn from Romney’s defeat?
  • Should a sensitive person learn to take criticism well? Why and how?
Listen or Download:

To comment on these questions or my answers, visit its comment thread.

Conclusion (1:11:28)

Thank you for joining us for this episode! If you enjoyed this episode, please contribute to contribute to our tip jar. Also, please submit and vote on questions for upcoming shows in in the question queue.

Support Philosophy in Action

Support
Our Work
Remember, Philosophy in Action Radio is available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing these radio shows, but they’re not free to produce: they require our time, effort, and money – week in and week out. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to our tip jar! You can send your contribution via Dwolla, PayPal, or US Mail.

Philosophy in Action

Philosophy in Action Radio broadcasts on Sunday mornings and Wednesday evenings. For information on upcoming shows, visit the Episodes on Tap.

To automatically download every new episode of Philosophy in Action, subscribe to the podcast RSS feed in your music player:

Keep in touch with Philosophy in Action:

    Philosophy in Action's NewsletterPhilosophy in Action's Facebook PagePhilosophy in Action's Twitter StreamPhilosophy in Action's RSS FeedPhilosophy in Action's YouTube Channel

  • http://smukalla.com/ Daniel Smukalla

    As a vegetarian (vegan for 7ish years, but now that’s a bit difficult in Korea), I still enjoyed your podcast – as always!

   
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha