Jan 072013
 

On Sunday’s episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, Greg Perkins and I answered questions on manipulating finances to qualify for welfare, initiating contact in friendship, poking fun at values, gay “conversion” therapy, and more. The podcast of that episode is now available for streaming or downloading.

You can automatically download podcasts of Philosophy in Action Radio by subscribing to Philosophy in Action’s Podcast RSS Feed:


Whole Podcast: 6 January 2013

Listen or Download:

Remember the Tip Jar!

The mission of Philosophy in Action is to spread rational principles for real life… far and wide. That’s why the vast majority of my work is available to anyone, free of charge. I love doing the radio show, but each episode requires an investment of time, effort, and money to produce. So if you enjoy and value that work of mine, please contribute to the tip jar. I suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. In return, contributors can request that I answer questions from the queue pronto, and regular contributors enjoy free access to premium content and other goodies.


Podcast Segments: 6 January 2013

You can download or listen to my answers to individual questions from this episode below.

Introduction

My News of the Week: I finished up Series 6 of Doctor Who, and Paul got me the best present ever!

Question 1: Manipulating Finances to Qualify for Welfare

Question: Is it wrong to manipulate your finances to qualify for welfare? An acquaintance of mine – who is moderately wealthy – feels justified in manipulating her finances to get government aid whenever possible on the grounds that it is “getting back” some of what she has paid. For example, she had her elderly mother buy a new car for her own use, in order to have her mother deplete her savings faster and qualify for Medicaid. However, while she had paid much in tax, her mother collects more in social security every month than she ever paid in taxes. Is it rational to view this as “getting back” money that was taken inappropriately, or is it actually immoral and self-destructive?

My Answer, In Brief: It’s wrong and destructive to game the welfare system. To do that is different in its essence from seeking to maximize tax breaks or attending a state university.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 2: Initiating Contact in Friendship

Question: Should friends initiate contact with each other roughly equally? Some of my friends never initiate contact with me. They are friendly, loyal, and otherwise great friends. But for any interaction or get-togethers, I must initiate conversation, suggest activities, and so on. Sometimes, I feel as if I value the friendship much, much more than the other person does. Is that an accurate assessment or is something else going on? Should I just seek other friends? Should I talk to these friends about this issue? (If so, what should I say?)

My Answer, In Brief: Friends need not initiate contact equally, as that can be a matter of personality differences or other inessentials. If you think that might mean that the friendship itself is unequal, then initiate friendly conversation to find out – and hopefully solve the problem.

Listen or Download:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 3: Poking Fun at Values

Question: When does humor work against my values? Sometimes, I wonder whether my jokes undermine what I value. Is it wrong to poke fun at my friends or myself? Is it wrong to joke about principles that I hold dear? How do I draw the line?

My Answer, In Brief: Humor, even when involving serious values, is all well and good provided that the intent and context are such that it’s purely benevolent, without any hidden malice or sneering.

Listen or Download:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 4: Gay “Conversion” Therapy

Question: Was California right or wrong to ban “gay cure” therapy for minors? Recently, California banned “reparative” or “conversion” therapy – meaning, therapy that aims to make gay teenagers straight. Such therapy is widely regarded as dangerous pseudo-science by mental health professionals. The ban only applies to patients under 18. So adults can still choose such therapy for themselves, but parents cannot foist it on their minor children. Is such therapy a form of child abuse? Or should parents have the power to compel such therapy on their children, even if they’re morally wrong to do so?

My Answer, In Brief: Gay “conversion” therapy, even when voluntary, can be deeply destructive to a teenager. I’m not sure that it should be banned, however.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Rapid Fire Questions

Questions:

  • What do you think of the fake “Brady Campaign” ads floating around Facebook lately?

Listen or Download:

  • Start Time: 1:17:25
  • Duration: 3:48
  • Download: MP3 Segment

To comment on these questions or my answers, visit its comment thread.

Conclusion

Be sure to check out the topics scheduled for upcoming episodes! Don’t forget to submit and vote on questions for future episodes too!

  • Start Time: 1:21:13


About Philosophy in Action Radio

Philosophy in Action Radio focuses on the application of rational principles to the challenges of real life. It broadcasts live on most Sunday mornings and many Thursday evenings over the internet. For information on upcoming shows, visit the Episodes on Tap. For podcasts of past shows, visit the Show Archives.

Philosophy in Action's NewsletterPhilosophy in Action's Facebook PagePhilosophy in Action's Twitter StreamPhilosophy in Action's RSS FeedsPhilosophy in Action's Calendar


  • Anthony

    Are you saying you are or are not against government scholarships? If not, what about legally manipulating your finances in order to qualify for government scholarships.

    I don’t see the distinction that you’ve drawn between medicaid and scholarships.

   
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha