Arabs on Arab Problems

 Posted by on 7 July 2002 at 9:58 pm  Uncategorized
Jul 072002
 

Josh “I need a blog” Zader sent me a link to a rather interesting story on the good grasp that Arab scholars and intellectuals have on the problems in their own countries.

I particularly enjoyed this tidbit:

But the academic Left isn’t alone in misjudging the Middle East. The realpolitik of the U.S. government that allies itself with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and other “moderate” Arab states offers little long-term hope for an improved relationship with people of the Middle East. It is no accident that America is more popular in countries whose awful governments hate the United States — Iraq and Iran, for example — than among the public of its so-called allies. Saudis, Kuwaitis, Pakistanis and Egyptians, after all, have been murdering Americans far more frequently than have Iranians, Iraqis and Syrians.

Yup!

(Josh mentioned that he found the story through InstaPundit, but I haven’t caught myself up on the InstaVacationBacklog yet. So it’s like those NBC summer reruns: New to me!)


Share This Post

Productiveness: The Next Battle

 Posted by on 7 July 2002 at 9:52 pm  Uncategorized
Jul 072002
 

Since my talk on honesty at the seminar was so well-received, I’ve been thinking about lecturing on other virtues at upcoming seminars. While it would make sense for me to return to start with the primary virtue in Objectivism, rationality, I think that I would like to focus on the virtue of productiveness next instead. My reasons are primarily personal, in the sense that productiveness is the virtue I have struggled with most over the past year. The problem is not that I’m unproductive, but rather that I think I could be so much more productive if I instilled good habits within myself. Or perhaps not. I just don’t know. So productiveness it is and shall be!

What follows are simply some preliminary notes on the direction I think such a lecture should take.

As usual, I would like to integrate a theoretical understanding of the virtue with its practical applications. As those who are familiar with my previous work on virtue, good habits will be just that link between theory and practice. (I was dissatisfied with my explication of the function of habit within the virtue of honesty in my recent lecture “White Lies, Black Lies.” I fear that I failed to convey the richness and robustness that habit brings to theory and practice of honesty. Additionally, there is much, much more in the psychology of habits that would be useful and productive for me to explore. For example, I am presently reading what promises to be an excellent and useful book entitled The Seven Sins of Memory. In short, I want to be sure to fully explicate the role of habits in any forthcoming lectures on virtue.)

From a theoretical perspective, the Objectivist case for productiveness is fairly simple. We need to create values in order to survive. Productiveness means creating those values necessary for life and happiness. Of course, there is always the perennial and thorny question of the prudent predator — or in this case the prudent moocher and prudent looter. I think the basic answer to these apparent counter-arguments is that we are wasting time and energy, not to mention creating bad habits, by keeping ourselves open to and on the lookout for such opportunities for predation. In other words, being on the prowl has consequences all its own.

Another theoretical issue concerns the relationship between the virtues of responsibility and productiveness. In common parlance, productiveness seems to relate primarily to work and career, while responsibility concerns all of life’s activities. So it would seem that responsibility might be the primary virtue, with productiveness as one aspect of it. This is essentially what David Kelley has argued. He conceives of productiveness as primarily relating to the creation of wealth. Responsibility is the more fundamental virtue of achieving all the values necessary for a long and happy life. He has a point.

However, I’m not sure that I entirely agree with this conceptual schema. Productiveness perhaps ought to be defined as David Kelley defines responsibility, as the virtue of achieving all the values necessary for a long and happy life. After all, one of Objectivism’s more interesting insights is the way in which the pursuit of value in an individual’s personal life is fundamentally the same as in the economic sphere. For example, Objectivists don’t just see trade as only activity of business relationships, but also something we do in friendships, in romantic relationships, and familial relationships. (The trades in such personal relationships, of course, tend to be longer-term, unaccounted, and more spiritual in nature than in business. But the fundamentals of trade still apply.) So it would not be unprecedented in Objectivism to take a virtue that seems to primarily apply to the economic sphere and broaden it to apply to all areas of life. Such would be essentially consistent with much of the Objectivist project in ethics.

Speaking of the relationship between virtues, I should also think about the nature of certain key minor virtues within productiveness, such as self-discipline, ambition, creativity. I will want to be able to given account of these aspects of productiveness, given how essential that are in daily life. One interesting topic along these lines would be an account of competitiveness, rational and irrational.

Also, on both a theoretical and a practical level, I am interested in comparing and contrasting the Objectivist virtue of productiveness with the ideas in the current business self-help literature, as well as the Protestant ethic of thrift and industry championed by Benjamin Franklin and others in years and centuries past.

From a purely practical perspective, the major issue seems to be how to become more productive in daily life. In other words, how can we make ourselves maximally-efficient pursuers of value in all areas of life? I think that I might find a great deal of insight in the business self-help literature. (But I will need to be careful not to get mired in the business side of productiveness, if I do take the virtue to be applying to all of life.) Some relevant question include:

  • What sort of habits of productiveness can we cultivate?
  • What are some tricks that help us get past the blocks?
  • How can we motivate ourselves to grand visions without burning out?
  • What is the role of relaxation and down time?
  • How does an active mental life contribute to productiveness?Those are just a few of the issues that come to mind at the moment. I’m sure there will be more!

Share This Post

Home Again, Home Again

 Posted by on 6 July 2002 at 10:04 pm  Uncategorized
Jul 062002
 

Paul and I just returned from the TOC summer seminar this evening. Giving seven lectures in six days was a painfully exhausting experience, but both the “Objectivism 101″ course and the “White Lies, Black Lies” talk were quite successful. I’ll be posting my PowerPoints in the next day or so. Raw tapes will also be available from the TOC. Blogging will resume tomorrow.

It’s good to be home!


Share This Post

Headed West

 Posted by on 25 June 2002 at 8:36 pm  Uncategorized
Jun 252002
 

I’m off to Los Angeles tomorrow morning for The Objectivist Center’s advanced seminar. After three delightful days of discussing papers, including my own, Paul will be joining me for a week of the regular summer seminar. So I probably won’t be blogging very much over the next ten days. But I promise to give a full report when I return.

Have good time without me!


Share This Post

Sony Speak

 Posted by on 25 June 2002 at 10:24 am  Uncategorized
Jun 252002
 

The Plantronics analog microphone headset for my recently acquired Sony digital voice recorder just arrived. Gauging by a first test, it seems to make a huge difference in the quality of Dragon NaturallySpeaking’s transcription from the DVR. Here was my first test, with corrections of errors in brackets:

This is the test of the new analog microphone from Plantronics. I’m not sure how well this will work I might need additional training in Dragon NaturallySpeaking before this set up [setup] with the digital was [voice] recorder and microphone works adequately

So only two errors! That’s much better than what I was getting without the microphone headset. Those transcriptions were way, way off.

However, all is not rosy here in the land of transcription. Yesterday I discovered that my Sony DVR has exactly the same problem as my Sony Clie, namely that my computer (running Win2000) will not read any memory stick in the usual fashion. My computer shows the memory stick (either in the Clie or in the DVR) as a drive, but it will not read that drive. It complains that the drive is not formatted, which is a bald-faced lie. With the Clie, I managed to transfer data between the computer and the memory stick using a handy little program called BlueSync, which syncs my memory stick during a HotSync.

So now, in order to transfer my voice recordings from the DVR to the computer for transcription, I have to move the memory card to the Clie and then HotSync. This is rather inconvenient, but at least that works. And I am particularly delighted to know that Dragon NaturallySpeaking’s transcription from the DVR with the new microphone works wonders!

And by the way, this is another blog entry written with Dragon NaturallySpeaking.


Share This Post

Islamic Honesty

 Posted by on 25 June 2002 at 7:39 am  Uncategorized
Jun 252002
 

A while back Andrew Sullivan pointed me towards this provacative quote found in an interview with Ehud Barak regarding Arafat and the Palestinian leadership:

They are products of a culture in which to tell a lie…creates no dissonance. They don’t suffer from the problem of telling lies that exists in Judeo-Christian culture. Truth is seen as an irrelevant category. There is only that which serves your purpose and that which doesn’t. They see themselves as emissaries of a national movement for whom everything is permissible. There is no such thing as “the truth.”

Clearly, Arafat is a lying sack of murderous shit. But does Arab or Islamic culture in general place less value on honesty and truth than does western culture? Based on the seemingly endless stream of absurd lies coming from that region, I suspect so. (Not that I think that Westerners hold truth and honesty in high enough regard, but that is another story.) And no, that’s not racism, it’s just not cultural relativism either.

One likely side effect of a culture of dishonesty with others is that it promotes a culture of self-deception. The fact that others frequently lie allows for a convenient escape hatch for any unpleasant facts that come your way, namely “Oh, they must be lying.” For example, when Osama bin Laden claimed credit for the bombing in the videotape, there was a great outcry from the Arab world that he didn’t do it. That denial makes sense, in a twisted sort of way. If your leaders lie to you all the time, then you definitely shouldn’t believe anything bad that they say. But, to be rational and honest and objective, you shouldn’t believe anything good they say either.

Here’s a related tidbit: According to anthropologists from and studying Iran, Iranians tend to say “No problem” to request for favors, even when they have no intention of performing such favors. It is generally considered rude to outright refuse someone. That seems to me to be a serious perversion of manners to me!


Share This Post

Silence and Death

 Posted by on 24 June 2002 at 8:11 pm  Uncategorized
Jun 242002
 

Do you think that Ann Landers was a wonderful person? Think again! This loving bit by her niece says it all:

You slipped away. You swore your daughter and staff to secrecy. Nobody was to know. Your wish was to be remembered as vital and indestructible by your public and your family — and you will be.

As you directed, there will be no funeral, no memorial, and your ashes will be quietly scattered over your beloved Lake Michigan. A fine plan, but how are the people you left behind to deal with the grief you have left in your wake?

What sort of callous person dies in deliberate silence like this? People don’t have funerals for their own benefit. They’re dead. What the living does has no effect on them any longer!

Funerals are for the benefit of the living, for the people who are left behind, for the people with holes in their hearts, for the people who can gain some comfort and solace by grieving with others. To forbid others this comfort when it makes no difference to you is perhaps the cruelest thing you can do to those allegedly loved ones.

To keep a serious illness secret until death is certainly more justifiable, as it allows a person to live to their fullest until their dying day. It is not a choice that I would make, but it is a legitimate and moral choice. However, such concealment means that the death comes as a terrible shock to others. And so secrecy before death makes a funeral after death so much more important in the grief process for those left behind. So to demand secrecy before death and silence afterwards is cruel indeed.

People generally condemn such behavior as “selfish.” But Ann Landers, and people who do such things, usually aren’t benefiting themselves in such action. As I mentioned, it makes no difference to dead Ann Landers whether people tend to her lifeless body this way or that way. What such allegedly “selfish” people all are is unthinking. They are not conscious of what they are doing. Or they are deliberately evil.

Whichever one of these Ann Landers was, I still say “good riddance!” Such people should not be doling out advice.


Share This Post

Speaking Naturally with Dragons

 Posted by on 24 June 2002 at 1:37 pm  Uncategorized
Jun 242002
 

Dear Paul,

This is the first thing that I am writing using Dragon NaturallySpeaking. It is working fairly well although making a number of mistakes. There are ways to fix that of which I am not yet aware. Overall it is pretty cool and I’m looking forward to learning how to use it to write blog entries, philosophy lectures, and philosophy papers with it.

Sadly, this is a pretty dorky letter. But it’s hard to think of things to say when using this software for the first time. I am pretty impressed with the microphone, it seems to be working rather well. And the software is pretty cool too. If it makes a mistake, I can give it verbal commands to correct its errors. It even gives me a menu of possible alternatives, like a spell checker. There are all manner of features that I’ll need to learn to get this to work properly.

I suppose that I will post this silly letter on my blog. But if I’m going to do that I’d better tell people what I’ve actually bought. I bought a high-end Sony digital voice recorder, one that uses a memory stick and came bundled with Dragon NaturallySpeaking version 6 (ICD-MS515VTP). I also bought a USB digital headset from Plantronics. I have also purchased other headset, an analog one from Plantronics, to be used with the digital voice recorder that will arrive tomorrow.

For the benefit of people other than Paul: So why did I buy this stuff? Well first of all, I do have problems with carpal tunnel. Since I spend so much time at my desk everyday, I am looking forward to relaxing back in my chair, far from my keyboard, while I write. Second, I often find that I have interesting philosophical thoughts while I’m out and about, far from my computer, particularly while I’m listening to be taped lectures. I often carry a crummy digital recorder to record such thoughts, then translate them back at my computer. But that seemed rather inefficient. Third, I was fascinated with the suggestion of one user of Dragon NaturallySpeaking that his writing was better, more friendly, more conversational, less dry, less academic, thanks to using voice recognition software.

So far, I’m pretty impressed. At the moment it is taking me more time to speak this than it would for me to type it. But I’m sure my speed will increase. I’m not much of a gadget freak, but this is pretty cool.

Your dearest woo,

Diana


Share This Post

Flo Control

 Posted by on 24 June 2002 at 10:37 am  Uncategorized
Jun 242002
 

Given how good the kitties have gotten at catching small creatures, I might need one of these someday.


Share This Post

Eeeeerie Fortune

 Posted by on 23 June 2002 at 10:54 pm  Uncategorized
Jun 232002
 

Wow, this fortune teller really hit the nail on the head! Unfortunately, I was the nail.


Share This Post

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha